clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Game 57: Hive Live

A4158c5e-bf1b-4d0e-92a6-c5e71b303a65_mediumMilwaukee 94 (28–33) | New Orleans 97 (35–22)

Tonight featured the Hornets in throw-backs, so technically we had the first Bucks/Bucs matchup in league history. I'm sure there were announcing problems all over the place for the TV and radio guys. Regardless, it was an exciting game right down to its nail-biter of a finish.

Actually, it was a little too close for comfort for my tastes. After leading the game by double digits for most of three quarters, the Hornets all but watched idly in the fourth as Milwaukee cut the deficit and took the lead, only to then lost it in the final 10 seconds. I was just waiting for the headlines to read "Hornets waste Paul's 20 assist night against short-handed Bucks."

The Hornets entered the fourth quarter with a 14 point lead. Confident in our odds of winning, Byron opted to sit CP (certainly reasonable). The team then reacted by waiting a whole 4 minutes and 20 seconds before making a shot from the field, at which point CP promptly re-entered the game. Even still, the Hornets continued to struggle and finished the quarter with an anemic performance of 5 for 13 with only 20 points to show for it.

Meanwhile, the Bucks went into pyscho mode, draining 7 treys and finishing the quarter with 33 points on 11 for 22 shooting. Charlie Bell alone notched down 11 points in the final 2:10. Eleven! Three treys and shot from the key. Amazing.

So where did it all (almost) go wrong? What made us fall apart at the seams? Honestly, it's difficult to tell. The easy explanation is we got cold and they got hot. Honestly though, most of our shooters were off all night. They had plenty of open looks (Paul was on fire with the passing... not so much the shooting), but they couldn't knock them down. The Hornets were downright awful from deep, going 4 for 21.

But we were able to offset that deficiency with our successes from inside the arc. In fact, all but one of CP's assists went to 4 players: DX, Tyson, Butler, and Marks. The lone remaining dish went to Peja (who made CP's only assisted trey).

Our other problems: taking care of the ball and finishing up around the rim on missed shots. The Bucks took the edge in the former, giving away 10 to our 14. And, despite a significant edge in total rebounds, the Hornets only tied the Bucks in offensive rebounds, and trailed 14 to 6 in second-chance points. That edge ended up being pretty huge considering the way the game finished.

Couple of observations before I leave you:

  • CP's 20 assists is one shy of his personal best as well as the franchise record. He went into the fourth only needing two assists to hit 21, but in seven and a half minutes he only managed one.
  • David finished with 28 points, 12 rebounds, an assist, and 2 steals. Don't look now, but DX is averaging almost 23 points and just over 10 rebounds a game since he returned from his suspension.
  • Before you get too excited about DX though, I should point out that he committed an unacceptable 6 turnovers tonight, which accounts for almost half the team's total.
  • Despite our woes from deep, the Hornets finished with comfortable margins in assists (26 to 15), rebounds (52 to 41), and points in the paint (50 to 34).
  • We went 11 of 17 from the stripe tonight. Those misses could have cost us big.
  • With four and a half minutes to play in the fourth, Charlie Villanueva hit the deck with an injury after losing control of an offensive rebound. With Villanueva on the floor, the Hornets ran a cherry picking play to Tyson on the other end of the court, anticipating the intentional foul to stop the game. Though at first I thought the ploy was distasteful (trying to capitalize on a 5 on 4 advantage despite someone writhing in pain), I came to see its justification. In this scenario, a cherry picker is bound to draw a shooting foul, rather than a foul on the floor, and the player's (Tyson's) openness increased the likelihood of both a basket and a foul. Additionally, the play happened quickly enough that I'm not sure that simply inbounding and taking the foul would have been any faster in terms of stopping play. Thoughts?
  • Melvin Ely shaved his head. We had awesome seats and were able to snap a few photos. Though this really doesn't qualify as news, I'll try to put up a fanpost tomorrow with the pics.

Photos courtesy of

Composed to: The Complete Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington Sessions

The opponent's take: Brew Hoop